Page values for "Ruling reflects America's ambivalence on guns"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | June 27, 2008 3:45:32 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | June 27, 2008 3:45:32 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=USA Today editorial board |source=USA Today |date=June 27, 2008 |url=http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/06/our-view-on-t-2.html |quote="Fortunately, the 5-4 decision to strike down the District of Columbia's tough ban on handgun possession didn't go as far as gun-control advocat ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Ruling reflects America's ambivalence on guns |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 4,436 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 4,436 |
| _pageName | Page | Ruling reflects America's ambivalence on guns |
| _pageTitle | String | Ruling reflects America's ambivalence on guns |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | District of Columbia v. Heller | |
| Position_fragment | String | Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
| Position | Page | District of Columbia v. Heller / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | for |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | USA Today editorial board |
| Source | Page | USA Today |
| Date | Date | June 27, 2008 |
| URL | URL | http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/06/our-view-on-t-2.html |
| Quote | Text | "Fortunately, the 5-4 decision to strike down the District of Columbia's tough ban on handgun possession didn't go as far as gun-control advocates had feared or the gun lobby had hoped. The justices agreed that a right to individual ownership doesn't mean that anyone can own any weapon. That leaves in place reasonable restrictions or outright bans on firearms such as machine guns and sawed-off shotguns, and exotic weapons such as surface-to-air missiles." |
| Summary | Wikitext | Ruling reflects America's ambivalence on guns by USA Today editorial board (USA Today, June 27, 2008) (view) |