Rhetoric of confrontation

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:45, December 31, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Guardian editorial board
Source The Guardian
Date December 22, 2006
URL http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,,1977564,00.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "It dropped the sensible notion of using carrots and sticks at a time when there is some evidence that pragmatists may be gaining ground against the extremists in Tehran. If the US and Britain understood in the frozen depths of the cold war that they had to talk to their Soviet enemy, surely Iran is too a serious a player in today's Middle East to be addressed solely through the rhetoric of confrontation?" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should negotiate with Iran on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.