Permission To Speak Freely

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 19:44, September 17, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Investor's Business Daily editorial board
Source Investor's Business Daily
Date September 11, 2006
URL http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=242868186693784
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Silencing political opposition is not reform; it's incumbent protection. In any other context, it would be called censorship. In any other country, it would be called repression. And when criticizing leaders is suppressed and campaign speech is regulated, supervised, watched, controlled, authorized or prohibited by an agency of the national government, it's called dictatorship." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be repealed on the topic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.