ObamaCare's summer of fall

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 00:17, July 17, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial board, |source=Las Vegas Review-Journal |date=July 14, 2013 |url=http://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/editorials/obamacares-...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial board
Source Las Vegas Review-Journal
Date July 14, 2013
URL http://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/editorials/obamacares-summer-fall
Quote
Quotes-start.png As reported by Investor’s Business Daily, the law forbids insurance companies from charging older people more than three times what it charges younger people. But that’s impossible to adhere to when the older person is a smoker, due to the smoking penalties. The only way to square it: huge premium charges for healthy young people, which will compel them to decline coverage and instead pay the $95 tax penalty to the IRS. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.