Obama’s signature gift for Iran: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Washington Times editorial board, |source=The Washington Times |date=February 24, 2015 |url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/24/editorial-obama-...") |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote=The usual suspects in the arms-control industry are making the usual noises. Daryl Kimball of the Arms Control Association tells The Associated Press that tough monitoring would supply “enough time to detect and disrupt” any attempt by Iran to continue to work on a bomb. But if there’s no will to stand up to Iran now, why would anyone expect such will to appear, as if by magic, when the Iranians flout an agreement? | |quote=The usual suspects in the arms-control industry are making the usual noises. Daryl Kimball of the Arms Control Association tells The Associated Press that tough monitoring would supply “enough time to detect and disrupt” any attempt by Iran to continue to work on a bomb. But if there’s no will to stand up to Iran now, why would anyone expect such will to appear, as if by magic, when the Iranians flout an agreement? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of | {{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action|Plan is beneficial|against}} |
Latest revision as of 22:21, July 17, 2015
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | The Washington Times editorial board |
---|---|
Source | The Washington Times |
Date | February 24, 2015 |
URL | http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/24/editorial-obama-iran-talks-move-toward-sweetheart-/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.