Page values for "Lock and Load"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateJune 27, 2008 4:18:19 PM
_modificationDateJune 27, 2008 4:18:19 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=June 27, 2008 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/27/opinion/27fri1.html |quote="Even if there were a constitutional right to possess guns for nonmilitary uses, constitutional rights are not absolute. The First A ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectLock and Load

"_fileData" values

"Opinions" values

TopicDistrict of Columbia v. Heller
Position_fragmentSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionDistrict of Columbia v. Heller / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_link

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

Stanceagainst

"Items" values

AuthorThe New York Times editorial board
SourceThe New York Times
DateJune 27, 2008
URLhttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/27/opinion/27fri1.html
Quote"Even if there were a constitutional right to possess guns for nonmilitary uses, constitutional rights are not absolute. The First Amendment guarantees free speech, but that does not mean that laws cannot prohibit some spoken words, like threats to commit imminent violent acts. In his dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer argued soundly that whatever right gun owners have to unimpeded gun use is outweighed by the District of Columbia’s “compelling” public-safety interests."
Summary

Lock and Load by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, June 27, 2008) (view)