Justice 5, Brutality 4

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:22, June 17, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=June 13, 2008 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/opinion/13fri1.html |quote="It was a very good day f...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date June 13, 2008
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/opinion/13fri1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "It was a very good day for people who value freedom and abhor Mr. Bush’s attempts to turn Guantánamo Bay into a constitutional-rights-free zone. The right of habeas corpus is so central to the American legal system that it has its own clause in the Constitution: it cannot be suspended except “when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Boumediene v. Bush.