Justice 5, Brutality 4

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:22, June 17, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=June 13, 2008 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/opinion/13fri1.html |quote="It was a very good day f...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date June 13, 2008
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/opinion/13fri1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "It was a very good day for people who value freedom and abhor Mr. Bush’s attempts to turn Guantánamo Bay into a constitutional-rights-free zone. The right of habeas corpus is so central to the American legal system that it has its own clause in the Constitution: it cannot be suspended except “when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Boumediene v. Bush.