Page values for "Justice 5, Brutality 4"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateJune 17, 2008 5:22:08 PM
_modificationDateJune 17, 2008 5:22:08 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=June 13, 2008 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/opinion/13fri1.html |quote="It was a very good day for people who value freedom and abhor Mr. Bush’s attempts to turn Guantánamo Bay into a constitutional-r ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectJustice 5, Brutality 4

"_fileData" values

"Opinions" values

TopicBoumediene v. Bush
Position_fragmentSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionBoumediene v. Bush / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_link

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

Stancefor

"Items" values

AuthorThe New York Times editorial board
SourceThe New York Times
DateJune 13, 2008
URLhttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/opinion/13fri1.html
Quote"It was a very good day for people who value freedom and abhor Mr. Bush’s attempts to turn Guantánamo Bay into a constitutional-rights-free zone. The right of habeas corpus is so central to the American legal system that it has its own clause in the Constitution: it cannot be suspended except “when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”"
Summary

Justice 5, Brutality 4 by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, June 13, 2008) (view)