Iraq’s salvation lies in letting it break apart: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new item)
 
(fixed source)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{item
|author=Peter Galbraith
|author=Peter Galbraith
|source=The Sunday TImes
|source=The Sunday Times (UK)
|date=July 16, 2006
|date=July 16, 2006
|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article688198.ece
|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article688198.ece

Latest revision as of 00:16, April 25, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Peter Galbraith
Source The Sunday Times (UK)
Date July 16, 2006
URL http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article688198.ece
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The country has broken up. The United States cannot put it back together again and cannot stop the civil war. The conventional wisdom holds that Iraq’s break-up would be destabilising and should be avoided at all costs. Looking at Iraq’s dismal history since Britain cobbled it together from three Ottoman provinces at the end of the first world war, it should be apparent that it is the effort to hold Iraq together that has been destabilising. " Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Iraq should be split up on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.