How Not to Deal with North Korea: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(new item) |
(date of article not date on cover of magazine) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|author=Richard J. Bernstein | |author=Richard J. Bernstein | ||
|source=New York Review of Books | |source=New York Review of Books | ||
|date= | |date=February 1, 2007 | ||
|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19923 | |url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19923 | ||
|quote="Officially, the Bush administration rejects the one approach that has proven useful in the past: formal, high-level, one-on-one negotiations with Pyongyang of the sort that Clinton pursued ... The situation can only be seen as a major failure of the Bush administration, which, despite all its bluster about the axis of evil and the use of preemptive military force to combat it, has yet to find a way either to punish North Korea for pursuing nuclear weapons or to offer rewards for it to stop its program." | |quote="Officially, the Bush administration rejects the one approach that has proven useful in the past: formal, high-level, one-on-one negotiations with Pyongyang of the sort that Clinton pursued ... The situation can only be seen as a major failure of the Bush administration, which, despite all its bluster about the axis of evil and the use of preemptive military force to combat it, has yet to find a way either to punish North Korea for pursuing nuclear weapons or to offer rewards for it to stop its program." |
Latest revision as of 19:03, March 26, 2007
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Richard J. Bernstein |
---|---|
Source | New York Review of Books |
Date | February 1, 2007 |
URL | http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19923 |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position United States should negotiate with North Korea on the topic North Korean nuclear crisis.