Geneva interim agreement on Iranian nuclear program

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:47, 26 November 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Wikipedia}} {{Topic |start date=November 24, 2013 |Themes=International relations, Middle East }}")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
For more information, see the Wikipedia article "Geneva interim agreement on Iranian nuclear program"

This is a topic, with start date November 24, 2013 and unknown end date.

Its theme(s) are International relations, Middle East.

Summary of positions for this topic[edit]

Full listing[edit]

Click on position names to view quotes from each listed item.

United States should not have signed agreement


All items that address this topic (13 total)[edit]

Title Author Source Date
‘Sucker’s deal’ Charles Krauthammer The Washington Post 2013-11-21
We Have a Deal With Iran. A Good One. Fred Kaplan Slate 2013-11-24
Iran deal is a diplomatic success story Eugene Robinson The Washington Post 2013-11-25
To reach Iran deal, secret diplomacy that worked David Ignatius The Washington Post 2013-11-25
A deal to regret Boston Herald editorial board Boston Herald 2013-11-26
Iran deal deserves a chance Los Angeles Times editorial board Los Angeles Times 2013-11-26
Israel's Freakout, Explained Yossi Klein Halevi The New Republic 2013-11-26
Progress in Iran: Americans should appreciate the initial accord Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 2013-11-26
Why the Iran deal infuriates America’s allies Benny Avni New York Post 2013-11-26
Worse Than Munich Bret Stephens The Wall Street Journal 2013-11-26
Iran deal relies too much on trust The Detroit News editorial board The Detroit News 2013-11-27
Talk beats war: Give the Iranian deal a chance Dan Simpson Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 2013-12-02
Obama administration oblivious to Iran danger Jack Kelly Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 2013-12-06