Page values for "Geneva Contention"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeSeptember 18, 2006 3:42:05 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeSeptember 18, 2006 3:47:18 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The Wall Street Journal editorial board |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=September 18, 2006 |url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008959 |quote="What's more, the definition of an "outrage" is context-dependent. What's outrageous when deali ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger2
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringGeneva Contention
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger1,949
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger1,949
_pageNamePageGeneva Contention
_pageTitleString

Geneva Contention

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

3 rows are stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageHamdan v. Rumsfeld
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageHamdan v. Rumsfeld / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageMilitary Commissions Act of 2006
Position_fragmentStringAct should be passed
PositionPageMilitary Commissions Act of 2006 / Act should be passed
Position_linkWikitext

Act should be passed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageMilitary Commissions Act of 2006
Position_fragmentStringCompeting Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed
PositionPageMilitary Commissions Act of 2006 / Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed
Position_linkWikitext

Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Wall Street Journal editorial board
SourcePageThe Wall Street Journal
DateDateSeptember 18, 2006
URLURLhttp://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008959
QuoteText"What's more, the definition of an "outrage" is context-dependent. What's outrageous when dealing with the likes of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, or a terrorist who might know about imminent plots, is clearly different than what's outrageous when dealing with a lawful combatant or prisoner of war."
SummaryWikitext

Geneva Contention by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, September 18, 2006) (view)