Page values for "Geneva Contention"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
_creationDate | Datetime | September 18, 2006 3:42:05 PM |
_modificationDate | Datetime | September 18, 2006 3:47:18 PM |
_creator | String | Yaron Koren |
_fullText | Searchtext | {{item |author=The Wall Street Journal editorial board |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=September 18, 2006 |url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008959 |quote="What's more, the definition of an "outrage" is context-dependent. What's outrageous when deali ... |
_categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
_numRevisions | Integer | 2 |
_isRedirect | Boolean | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | String | Geneva Contention |
_pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 1,949 |
_lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
_pageID | Integer | 1,949 |
_pageName | Page | Geneva Contention |
_pageTitle | String | Geneva Contention |
_pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
3 rows are stored for this pageField | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Topic | Page | Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | |
Position_fragment | String | Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
Position | Page | Hamdan v. Rumsfeld / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
Position_link | Wikitext | ||
Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Topic | Page | Military Commissions Act of 2006 | |
Position_fragment | String | Act should be passed | |
Position | Page | Military Commissions Act of 2006 / Act should be passed | |
Position_link | Wikitext | ||
Stance | String | for · mixed · against | for |
Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Topic | Page | Military Commissions Act of 2006 | |
Position_fragment | String | Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed | |
Position | Page | Military Commissions Act of 2006 / Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed | |
Position_link | Wikitext | ||
Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | The Wall Street Journal editorial board |
Source | Page | The Wall Street Journal |
Date | Date | September 18, 2006 |
URL | URL | http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008959 |
Quote | Text | "What's more, the definition of an "outrage" is context-dependent. What's outrageous when dealing with the likes of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, or a terrorist who might know about imminent plots, is clearly different than what's outrageous when dealing with a lawful combatant or prisoner of war." |
Summary | Wikitext | Geneva Contention by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, September 18, 2006) (view) |