For now, US must resist call for no-fly zone over Libya

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 18:05, March 13, 2011 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Text replace - "enforce a no-fly zone" to "impose a no-fly zone")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Boston Globe editorial board
Source The Boston Globe
Date March 8, 2011
URL http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2011/03/08/for_now_us_must_resist_call_for_no_fly_zone_over_libya/
Quote
Quotes-start.png A great strength of the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt is that they were home-grown. They would have been compromised by use of American arms or will. Obama’s low-key response may have frustrated those who wish to mold the world to American contours; but it brought about a demonstrably better result: The promise of legitimate, native-born democracies. Likewise, Libyans rebelling against Khadafy’s regime will have a far greater claim to legitimacy if they can overthrow the dictator without bombing runs by American fighter jets taking off from US aircraft carriers. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should impose a no-fly zone on the topic 2011 Libyan uprising.