Financial 'Reform' or Revenge?

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 04:40, July 26, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Robert J. Samuelson |source=Newsweek |date=July 6, 2010 |url=http://www.newsweek.com/2010/07/06/financial-reform-or-revenge.html |quote="The trouble is that—cont...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Robert J. Samuelson
Source Newsweek
Date July 6, 2010
URL http://www.newsweek.com/2010/07/06/financial-reform-or-revenge.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The trouble is that—contrary to conventional wisdom—"too big to fail" was just a symptom of the crisis, not its basic cause. That was old-fashioned bad lending: home loans to borrowers who couldn't repay. The panic arose because no one knew the size or location of the losses, now estimated to exceed $1 trillion. Ironically, the legislation may weaken the government's ability to quell future panics by restricting-in highly technical ways-the Fed's authority to lend to panic-stricken institutions in the midst of crisis." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Restoring American Financial Stability Act.