Fear failure, not health care reform: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{Item |author=Jesse Jackson |source=Chicago Sun-Times |date=August 11, 2009 |url=http://www.suntimes.com/news/jackson/1709763,CST-EDT-jesse11.article |quote="This isn't as effic...')
 
m (Text replace - 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' to 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act')
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|quote="This isn't as efficient as single-payer. But it would get 97 percent of Americans and virtually all kids covered, do a better job of catching diseases early and help eliminate the most outrageous insurance company gambits to make money."
|quote="This isn't as efficient as single-payer. But it would get 97 percent of Americans and virtually all kids covered, do a better job of catching diseases early and help eliminate the most outrageous insurance company gambits to make money."
}}
}}
{{Opinion|America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009|Act should be passed|for}}
{{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should be passed|for}}

Latest revision as of 14:32, March 11, 2010

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jesse Jackson
Source Chicago Sun-Times
Date August 11, 2009
URL http://www.suntimes.com/news/jackson/1709763,CST-EDT-jesse11.article
Quote
Quotes-start.png "This isn't as efficient as single-payer. But it would get 97 percent of Americans and virtually all kids covered, do a better job of catching diseases early and help eliminate the most outrageous insurance company gambits to make money." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.