Delay, Obstruction and Darfur

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 19:31, December 10, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=December 10, 2007 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/10/opinion/10mon1.html |quote="Without a lot more i...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date December 10, 2007
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/10/opinion/10mon1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Without a lot more international pressure, Sudan will continue to obstruct the peacekeeping mission and spread ever more suffering and mayhem. China, one of Sudan’s major trading partners, and the Arab League must bring on that pressure. And the U.N. and other envoys must work full time for the resumption of peace talks. The credibility of the Security Council is on the line. So are the lives of 2.5 million Darfuris." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position China should pressure the Sudan to end the conflict on the topic Darfur conflict.