Page values for "Delay, Obstruction and Darfur"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeDecember 10, 2007 7:31:27 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeDecember 10, 2007 7:31:27 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=December 10, 2007 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/10/opinion/10mon1.html |quote="Without a lot more international pressure, Sudan will continue to obstruct the peacekeeping mission and spread ever more suffer ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringDelay, Obstruction and Darfur
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger4,020
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger4,020
_pageNamePageDelay, Obstruction and Darfur
_pageTitleString

Delay, Obstruction and Darfur

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageDarfur conflict
Position_fragmentStringChina should pressure the Sudan to end the conflict
PositionPageDarfur conflict / China should pressure the Sudan to end the conflict
Position_linkWikitext

China should pressure the Sudan to end the conflict

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The New York Times editorial board
SourcePageThe New York Times
DateDateDecember 10, 2007
URLURLhttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/10/opinion/10mon1.html
QuoteText"Without a lot more international pressure, Sudan will continue to obstruct the peacekeeping mission and spread ever more suffering and mayhem. China, one of Sudan’s major trading partners, and the Arab League must bring on that pressure. And the U.N. and other envoys must work full time for the resumption of peace talks. The credibility of the Security Council is on the line. So are the lives of 2.5 million Darfuris."
SummaryWikitext

Delay, Obstruction and Darfur by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, December 10, 2007) (view)