Cracking Iran, From Inside And Out

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:31, July 11, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board |source=Investor's Business Daily |date=July 10, 2007 |url=http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=268959857283011 |quote=...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Investor's Business Daily editorial board
Source Investor's Business Daily
Date July 10, 2007
URL http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=268959857283011
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Already Iran has begun to ration gasoline, setting off major riots. Because of Iran's heavy subsidies and failure to attract new investment, some analysts believe it will have to start importing oil within five to 10 years — even though it has the world's No. 2 oil reserves. A well-targeted strike on Iran's main gasoline refinery would ruin its economy. So would a strike, now rather than later, on its nuclear facilities at Natanz and Bushehr." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.


This item argues for the position Iranian regime overthrow should be encouraged on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.