Bomb Syria, Even if It Is Illegal

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 19:33, August 28, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Ian Hurd |source=The New York Times |date=August 27, 2013 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-it-is-illegal.html |quote=There is n...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Ian Hurd
Source The New York Times
Date August 27, 2013
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-it-is-illegal.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png There is no doubt that Mr. Assad’s government has violated humanitarian principles throughout the two-year-old war, including the prohibition on the indiscriminate killing of civilians, even in non-international conflicts, set out in 1949 in the Geneva Conventions. But the conventions also don’t mean much unless the Security Council agrees to act. It is an indictment of the current state of international law that there is no universally recognized basis to intervene. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.