Bipartisanship is good for both sides: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: {{item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board |source=Los Angeles Times |date=August 9, 2007 |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-slaughter9aug09,0,2060608.story |quote="We s...)
 
(rv testing)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{Item
|author=Los Angeles Times editorial board
|author=Anne-Marie Slaughter
|source=Los Angeles Times
|source=Los Angeles Times
|date=August 9, 2007
|date=August 9, 2007
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}


{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed|for}}
{{Opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed|for}}

Latest revision as of 00:20, August 21, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Anne-Marie Slaughter
Source Los Angeles Times
Date August 9, 2007
URL http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-slaughter9aug09,0,2060608.story
Quote
Quotes-start.png "We should hear from Gen. David Petraeus, the top military commander in Iraq, in September and then announce a timetable for shifting the nature of U.S. operations in Iraq, withdrawing combat troops as the surge comes to an end and turning to special operations and support of Iraqi troops. That timetable, in turn, is the lever we now need to bring other regional and international actors to the table to create the regionwide Iraq Support Group envisioned by the Baker-Hamilton report." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.