Behind US v. Arizona: pure politics

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 11:39, July 13, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Kris Kobach |source=New York Post |date=July 12, 2010 |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/behind_us_arizona_pure_politics_doTiHt4iEpjt4mlSMPMv...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Kris Kobach
Source New York Post
Date July 12, 2010
URL http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/behind_us_arizona_pure_politics_doTiHt4iEpjt4mlSMPMvlO
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Because other kinds of pre-emption don't apply, the department can only win if it can show a conflict with federal law. But there is no federal statute that Arizona's law conflicts with. The department's legal filings don't offer any answer to this fundamental problem. The opinions of the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits of the US Court of Appeals (which are all of the circuits that have addressed the issue) also support the authority of Arizona to enact its law." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Lawsuit was justified on the topic United States of America v. Arizona.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=Behind_US_v._Arizona:_pure_politics&oldid=12421"