Page values for "Behind US v. Arizona: pure politics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | July 13, 2010 11:39:32 AM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | July 13, 2010 11:39:32 AM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=Kris Kobach |source=New York Post |date=July 12, 2010 |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/behind_us_arizona_pure_politics_doTiHt4iEpjt4mlSMPMvlO |quote="Because other kinds of pre-emption don't apply, the department can only win if it can show a conflict with ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Behind US v. Arizona: pure politics |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 6,611 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 6,611 |
| _pageName | Page | Behind US v. Arizona: pure politics |
| _pageTitle | String | Behind US v. Arizona: pure politics |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | United States of America v. Arizona | |
| Position_fragment | String | Lawsuit was justified | |
| Position | Page | United States of America v. Arizona / Lawsuit was justified | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Kris Kobach |
| Source | Page | New York Post |
| Date | Date | July 12, 2010 |
| URL | URL | http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/behind_us_arizona_pure_politics_doTiHt4iEpjt4mlSMPMvlO |
| Quote | Text | "Because other kinds of pre-emption don't apply, the department can only win if it can show a conflict with federal law. But there is no federal statute that Arizona's law conflicts with. The department's legal filings don't offer any answer to this fundamental problem. The opinions of the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits of the US Court of Appeals (which are all of the circuits that have addressed the issue) also support the authority of Arizona to enact its law." |
| Summary | Wikitext | Behind US v. Arizona: pure politics by Kris Kobach (New York Post, July 12, 2010) (view) |