Bad medicine: Stimulus bill is sickening

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 20:47, 1 February 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=New Hampshire Union Leader editorial board |source=New Hampshire Union Leader |date=January 30, 2009 |url=http://unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=2a505eff-803e-40d6-a1...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) New Hampshire Union Leader editorial board
Source New Hampshire Union Leader
Date January 30, 2009
URL http://unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=2a505eff-803e-40d6-a1cc-4a5976b88449
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The Wall Street Journal calculated that only 12 percent of the bill's provisions can accurately be called stimulative. The rest is simply being thrown at favored constituencies by Congress. The bill even includes a provision forbidding the use of foreign steel in the construction projects it funds. Does no one in Congress remember Smoot-Hawley?" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.