Page values for "A war-time precedent"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeSeptember 28, 2006 3:46:30 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeJuly 16, 2007 4:35:39 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The Washington Times editorial board |source=The Washington Times |date=June 30, 2006 |url=http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060629-090418-3461r.htm |quote="In stark contrast to Ex parte Quirin -- the 1942 decision that upheld the constitutionality of a military tribunal es ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger3
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringA war-time precedent
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger2,114
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger2,114
_pageNamePageA war-time precedent
_pageTitleString

A war-time precedent

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageHamdan v. Rumsfeld
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageHamdan v. Rumsfeld / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Washington Times editorial board
SourcePageThe Washington Times
DateDateJune 30, 2006
URLURLhttp://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060629-090418-3461r.htm
QuoteText"In stark contrast to Ex parte Quirin -- the 1942 decision that upheld the constitutionality of a military tribunal established to try, and ultimately convict, German saboteurs -- the Supreme Court yesterday issued an appalling 5-3 decision that encroaches on the authority of a president during a time of war."
SummaryWikitext

A war-time precedent by The Washington Times editorial board (The Washington Times, June 30, 2006) (view)