A defeat for Bolton could undercut US policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Cosmetic changes) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Reference|Why I'll Vote for Bolton}} | {{Reference|Why I'll Vote for Bolton}} | ||
{{Reference|A public advocate for the United States}} | {{Reference|A public advocate for the United States}} | ||
{{Reference|The Genocide Test}} |
Revision as of 03:16, January 18, 2008
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Thomas M. Boyd |
---|---|
Source | The Boston Globe |
Date | August 1, 2006 |
URL | http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/08/01/a_defeat_for_bolton_could_undercut_us_policy/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.
This item argues against the position Confirmation should be filibustered on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.
This item refers to the previous opinion item Why I'll Vote for Bolton.
This item refers to the previous opinion item A public advocate for the United States.
This item refers to the previous opinion item The Genocide Test.