A dangerous gamble in Gaza: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - '2008-2009' to '2008–2009') |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - '2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict' to 'Gaza War') |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="What is urgently needed now is: an internationally monitored ceasefire, of sufficient duration to resume and conclude negotiations on that basis; for Israel then to lift the blockade; and for new elections to decide who speaks for the Palestinians – Fatah, whose position is fast being eroded by this crisis, Hamas, or a combination of them both." | |quote="What is urgently needed now is: an internationally monitored ceasefire, of sufficient duration to resume and conclude negotiations on that basis; for Israel then to lift the blockade; and for new elections to decide who speaks for the Palestinians – Fatah, whose position is fast being eroded by this crisis, Hamas, or a combination of them both." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion| | {{Opinion|Gaza War|Israel was right to attack Gaza|against}} |
Latest revision as of 17:40, July 14, 2009
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Financial Times editorial board |
---|---|
Source | Financial Times |
Date | January 4, 2009 |
URL | http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e56ac646-da93-11dd-8c28-000077b07658.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic Gaza War.