Page values for "A Verdict on Sarbanes-Oxley: Unconstitutional"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateDecember 22, 2006 4:38:49 PM
_modificationDateDecember 22, 2006 4:38:49 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{item |author=Kenneth Starr |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=December 16, 2006 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116622779979652012.html |quote="In short, the government's theory seems to be: "Why worry? There are no real problems here. If there are, the SEC can take care of them. ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectA Verdict on Sarbanes-Oxley: Unconstitutional

"_fileData" values

"Opinions" values

TopicSarbanes-Oxley Act
Position_fragmentAct should be repealed
PositionSarbanes-Oxley Act / Act should be repealed
Position_linkAct should be repealed
Stancefor

"Items" values

AuthorKenneth Starr
SourceThe Wall Street Journal
DateDecember 16, 2006
URLhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB116622779979652012.html
Quote"In short, the government's theory seems to be: "Why worry? There are no real problems here. If there are, the SEC can take care of them." But our constitutional system is not structured that way. Unelected commissions should not have the power to regulate, tax, and even punish companies and individuals."
SummaryA Verdict on Sarbanes-Oxley: Unconstitutional by Kenneth Starr (The Wall Street Journal, December 16, 2006) (view)