A U.N. eye-opener

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 19:29, September 27, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The San Diego Union-Tribune editorial board
Source The San Diego Union-Tribune
Date September 27, 2006
URL http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060927/news_lz1ed27top.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "If anything confirms the vapidity of Senate Democrats' views of Bolton and the U.N., it is the huge ovations that U.N. delegates lavished on ChÁvez and Ahmadinejad – two madmen thugs." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.