Page values for "A Shift on Abortions"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeApril 19, 2007 3:17:03 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeApril 19, 2007 3:17:03 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=April 19, 2007 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/18/AR2007041802302.html |quote="The most immediately disturbing aspect of the ruling is the majority's breezy dismissal of medica ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringA Shift on Abortions
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger3,334
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger3,334
_pageNamePageA Shift on Abortions
_pageTitleString

A Shift on Abortions

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageGonzales v. Carhart
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageGonzales v. Carhart / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Washington Post editorial board
SourcePageThe Washington Post
DateDateApril 19, 2007
URLURLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/18/AR2007041802302.html
QuoteText"The most immediately disturbing aspect of the ruling is the majority's breezy dismissal of medical evidence that the partial-birth procedure is sometimes in the best interest of a pregnant woman's health."
SummaryWikitext

A Shift on Abortions by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, April 19, 2007) (view)