A Defeat for the Democracies: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
|date=August 21, 2006
|date=August 21, 2006
|url=http://www.humanevents.com/winningthefuture.php?id=16602
|url=http://www.humanevents.com/winningthefuture.php?id=16602
|quote=" This ceasefire is not a precursor to peace. But don't just take my word for it. Within 24 hours of the cease-fire, in a series of carefully orchestrated statements, the dictators of Iran and Syria both claimed credit for defeating not just Israel, but America as well."
|quote="This ceasefire is not a precursor to peace. But don't just take my word for it. Within 24 hours of the cease-fire, in a series of carefully orchestrated statements, the dictators of Iran and Syria both claimed credit for defeating not just Israel, but America as well."
}}
}}


{{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire|against}}
{{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire|against}}

Latest revision as of 17:19, August 22, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Newt Gingrich
Source Human Events
Date August 21, 2006
URL http://www.humanevents.com/winningthefuture.php?id=16602
Quote
Quotes-start.png "This ceasefire is not a precursor to peace. But don't just take my word for it. Within 24 hours of the cease-fire, in a series of carefully orchestrated statements, the dictators of Iran and Syria both claimed credit for defeating not just Israel, but America as well." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.