A Balance for Labor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Resaving) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=March 12, 2007 | |date=March 12, 2007 | ||
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/11/AR2007031100988.html | |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/11/AR2007031100988.html | ||
|quote="The ability of employees to organize -- indeed, even the prospect that they could do so -- is a critical component of achieving fairness in the workplace, and it is a core democratic right. Labor and its legislative allies would do better to concentrate on finding practical ways to protect it, rather than seeking a politically unachievable, and substantively unwise, result." | |quote="The ability of employees to organize -- indeed, even the prospect that they could do so -- is a critical component of achieving fairness in the workplace, and it is a core democratic right. Labor and its legislative allies would do better to concentrate on finding practical ways to protect it, rather than seeking a politically unachievable, and substantively unwise, result."}} | ||
}} | |||
{{opinion|Employee Free Choice Act|Act should be passed|against}} | {{opinion|Employee Free Choice Act|Act should be passed|against}} |
Latest revision as of 12:58, March 16, 2007
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | The Washington Post editorial board |
---|---|
Source | The Washington Post |
Date | March 12, 2007 |
URL | http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/11/AR2007031100988.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Employee Free Choice Act.